Documentation of Procedures for Dissolved Free Amino Acids Analysis Most sampling and all analyses were performed by Joan E. Sheldon (now in Department of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia - jsheldon@arches.uga.edu). Samples were collected in clean 5-liter Niskin samplers, using surgical silicone tubing for closure. Samples were taken directly from the Niskin samplers either by attaching a new 50 ml syringe to the hosecock with a short length of acid-cleaned tygon tubing or by removing the plunger, filling the syringe, and replacing the plunger in the syringe barrel. The first 10 ml were expelled through a 0.2 µm Anotec filter cartridge to wash the filter. Three 10 ml subsamples were then expelled through the Anotec cartridge into fired scintillation vials. The vials were capped with cone-lined caps that had been acid-washed and rinsed with HPLC-grade water. The sample vials were placed in a freezer and were returned without thawing to the home laboratory for analysis by HPLC, following the general precolumn derivatization procedure of Lindroth and Mopper (1978) and Mopper and Lindroth (1982). We followed the specific procedures of Henrichs and Williams (1985), except that samples were thawed at 4°C, 2 ml subsamples were derivatized, and 300 µl were injected. Derivatized primary amino acids were separated in a 250 x 4.6 mm cartridge-style column (Alltech) packed with spherisorb ODS-1, 5 µm (Phase Separation) and detected using a Kratos FS970 spectrofluoromonitor. The amino acids quantified were aspartic acid, glutamic acid, serine, histidine+threonine+glycine (co-eluted), alanine, tyrosine, arginine, methionine, valine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, leucine, and lysine. Triplicates were usually run in the HPLC. Areas under the curve of each amino acid were integrated. In making a best estimate of the concentration of each amino acid, the variance around both the samples and the standards was taken into account in reporting upper and lower 95% confidence limits. See estimation of X from Y in Sokal and Rohlf (1981). While most analytical values fell within a quite narrow range, an occasional set of samples was much higher in DFAA content. Such disparities are usually written off as failures of clean procedure. However, in view of the fact that the replicates agree, we report these values. Future users of the data can make of them what they wish. On the Blue Fin cruise of January 1991, we experimented with other kinds of filter cartridges. Replicate samples with the suffix N are filtered through a 0.2 µm Nuclepore filter. Replicate samples with the suffix M are filtered through a 0.45 µm Millipore cartridge. References Henrichs, SM, Williams, PM 1985. Dissolved and particulate amino acids and carbohydrates in the sea surface microlayer. Mar. Chem. 17: 141-163. Lindroth, P, Mopper, K 1978. High performance liquid chromatographic determination of subpicomole amounts of amino acids by precolumn fluorescence derivatization with o-phthalaldehyde. Analyt. Chem. 51: 1667-1674. Mopper, K., Lindroth, P. 1982. Diel and depth variations in dissolved free amino acids and ammonium in the Baltic Sea determined by shipboard HPLC analysis. Limnol. Oceanogr. 27: 336-347. Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry, 2nd Edition. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.